On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:27:20PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > You're just talking about bringing back apr-util.
The motivation for combining the apr and apr-util "projects" (separate tarball distributions) was that there we never had enough "churn" in either to justify the additional overhead of a separate RM cycle for each. So I agree we don't need to go back to even higher RM overhead with lots of "projects". But I agree totally with Graham that splitting out the sub-components into separate *libraries* is good and useful, so as to isolate deps on third-party libraries; that's always been the plan AFAIK. I did at least start the groundwork on the buildsystem support for that (r758206). Regards, Joe
