On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 9/6/2011 4:24 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> On 9/6/2011 9:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>>> >>>> I can take care of T&R of APR 0.9.20 in a couple of days provided that >>>> someone first gets CVE-2011-1928 resolved in that branch. >>> >>> That's already done for some time now; >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/strings/ >>> >>> although I still need to update CHANGES already. >> >> Now changed, and rechecked our merged rev. This looks good to go >> if you would like to move forwards. > > I'll plan to get started looking for concerns and rolling in time to > have candidates available before I leave for Redwood Shores early > Monday.
err, add 1 day to that estimate :( > >> >> Did anyone else have immediate concerns for this 0.9 branch? >> >>> I hadn't attempted to port fnmatch tests to CuTest, if anyone is >>> interested in doing so, be my guest. >> >> No interest in porting, here, I don't see a whole lot of reasons >> to do so as the code is effectively identical. >> > > Maybe I'll hack something up just quick enough to check for mortal > embarrassment. (A bit of cut and paste and #define should suffice.) > > > -- > Born in Roswell... married an alien... > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien...
