On 12/14/2011 04:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Reposting for Graham's benefit, who likely skimmed over this; > > On 12/11/2011 1:49 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> - Windows Build system: >> - all *.dep and *.mak files are missing >> - in test/testutildll.dsp the probably obsolete string "NT" is >> by the possibly similarly obsolete "9x" >> - change of base addresses in some dsp file (might be OK) > > Bill asks, can you be more specific on the 3rd bullet? Because we aim > for binary compatibility, that would be a (regrettable) regression. As > I was traveling, I had no chance to look at this candidate. >
If you look at old version multiple modules has the same base address which was probably caused by simple copy/paste. Eg, multiple dbd modules had the same base address (0x6EF00000) dmb modules had the same address as dbd modules. I only made sure they are unique, because if you try to load the second dll with the same base address it'll get random one. Regards -- ^TM
