On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 15:29 -0800, Chris Darroch wrote: > The patch might also need to account for the !APR_HAS_RANDOM case, > now that I look again.
Yes, true. > So I'm less than certain what to suggest here ... We can always use ANSI C rand()/srand() (racy) or even other APR random functions from http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/1.4/group__apr__random.html. PS. The address of ht will be somewhat random on Linux platforms with exec shield. -- Bojan
