cut/paste killed the "command" $ ./testall -x testxlate testbuckets
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Michael Felt <[email protected]> wrote: > michael@x054:[/data/prj/apr/apr-util-1.4.1/test]stxlate > testbuckets < > teststrmatch : SUCCESS > testuri : SUCCESS > testuuid : SUCCESS > testpass : SUCCESS > testmd4 : SUCCESS > testmd5 : SUCCESS > testcrypto : SUCCESS > testdbd : SUCCESS > > testdate : SUCCESS > testmemcache : SUCCESS > testxml : SUCCESS > testrmm : SUCCESS > testdbm : SUCCESS > testqueue : SUCCESS > testreslist : SUCCESS > All tests passed. > > michael@x054:[/data/prj/apr/apr-util-1.4.1/test]stxlate > testbuckets < > teststrmatch : SUCCESS > testuri : SUCCESS > testuuid : SUCCESS > testpass : SUCCESS > testmd4 : SUCCESS > testmd5 : SUCCESS > testcrypto : SUCCESS > testdbd : SUCCESS > > testdate : SUCCESS > testmemcache : SUCCESS > testxml : SUCCESS > testrmm : SUCCESS > testdbm : SUCCESS > testqueue : SUCCESS > testreslist : SUCCESS > All tests passed. > > So testxlate and testbuckets fail on a "user" system, no dev stuff > installed. > > If I get different results on the dev server I'll update. > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michael Felt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> if testdbd is first, seems to have passed, but I shall try the -x option >> as soon as I get the development server turned on again. >> >> If it is happening elsewhere, then maybe it is not just IBM's way of >> doing iconv. >> >> It looks like a segmentation error after a pipe call to /bin/sh. I was >> thinking, once I know where to look, to do the iconv command manually >> and/or as a regular script and see if that tells me/i.e., you, anything >> useful to determine the cause. >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Knauf <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Michael, >>> Am 20.09.2012 10:34, schrieb Guenter Knauf: >>> >>> Am 20.09.2012 08:53, schrieb Michael Felt: >>>> >>>>> Yes, unfortunately? or fortunately! >>>>> >>>> hehe, I would say fortunately since that makes it no regression and >>>> therefore your issue might not be something to hold back 1.5.1 ;-) >>>> >>> of course this doesnt mean that we shouldnt look into it; BTW. this test >>> fails on NetWare too, so seems its a bit picky, whatever ... >>> best is that you exclude this test for now so that you can proceed with >>> testing in order to see what else fails; testdbd did also fail, or? >>> then try: >>> aputest -x testdbd -x testxlate >>> >>> Gün. >>> >>> >>> >> >
