On 11.03.2013 05:41, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > We chatted a bit about this at hackathon in Portland, but I'd love a > show of hands of apr project members, who would be actively willing to > foster the existing scons solution, and who is actively interested in > maintaining a new cmake solution, if offered?
I managed to miss that hackathon. But I would gladly help if we decided to add a cmake build. And I prefer cmake over SCons simply because it appears to be a lot more mature; I've looked at SCons several times in the past and got the feeling that for any kind of realistic cross-platform build, one would have to invent a lot of what autoconf (and cmake) already have. -- Brane
