"William A. Rowe Jr." <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:14:31 +0000 (UTC) > Igor Galić <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> caused by this projects creative use of APR: >> https://code.google.com/p/unimrcp/issues/detail?id=29 >> >> Is there anything I can do other than compile a sepcial version of >> APR for this project's requirements? > > That's what happens when projects don't push hacks upstream :( > Sorry we can't provide too much guidance. If there is a submitted > patch under the AL lying around somewhere, please flag it to the > dev@ list for consideration.
The patch adds a mutex to apr_pool_t and locks the mutex in calls to apr_palloc, apr_pool_clear and apr_pool_destroy. That may make those individual calls threadsafe but it doesn't really make pool use as a whole threadsafe. If one thread clears a pool every other thread using the pool is left with dangling references. It looks like a lot of locking for no real gain. -- Philip
