Sorry this previously got sent to you Jeff, Thunderbird does that with
the APR list on reply.
On 5/6/2013 7:28 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com
<mailto:traw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com
<mailto:cove...@gmail.com>> wrote:
confirm test fails on solaris/amd64 too
Unless I've missed something, no one has tested on Windows yet.
I'll try to test that in the next few hours to see if there is
anything else obvious to fix before tagging 1.4.8.
1.4.7 built/tested with MinGW shows no regressions from 1.4.6:
Failed Tests Total Fail Failed %
===================================================
testdso 5 4 80.00%
testmmap 8 3 37.50%
testshm 5 2 40.00%
testshm passes when run as administrator. IIRC, testdso doesn't work
from MinGW until 1.5, and testmmap has a line ending glitch when you
build from .tar.*z -- some Windows code in the test program expects
CRLF in a data file.
Known about the shm, and because the .dsp files must be CRLF, I've
always converted line endings prior to build and never run into this.
With a Visual Studio 2010 build, testsock is failing inconsistently.
(no fail, line 234, line 165, now I can't see a failure again ... )
Isn't this the sort of issue Rainer reported in the past?
It *seems* that Windows has no regressions that are exposed by the APR
test suite, but to be more certain I'd need to bang on testsock a lot
harder with different versions/builds.
I see no regressions with VC9 on Vista. It has my non-binding +1
Now, time to manually clean out the 16gig of test files that a clean misses.
Gregg
