On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:44:52 +0100 Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100 > > "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > > > > > I think the dll load function should be converted to a more stable > > > pattern, that properly handles multiple threads. And perhaps we > > > should just assume a few more NT functions to be alsways there > > > instead of loading them dynamically. > > > > This is possible with the 'mandatory' call to apr_init, but I think > > the existing pattern should persist for those who don't like to > > call the initialization logic. > > > > We currently call apr_initialize() before spawning threads or doing > anything other APR. What else do we need to become thread-safe > under Windows? Working on a patch. Simply, we just need an _initialize hack that triggers this lookup for each internally required (or not-present) fn.
