On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 7, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 for APR trunk, +0.9 for future APR 1.6.x, -0.9 for APR 1.5.x... > > > > alternate opinions? > > > > As far as I know, C guarantees that > > if (a) > > is the same as > > if (a != 0) > > So I'm unsure of the need for this patch. > The real question is, for an "unsigned a != 0", can "(int)a" become 0 after an implicit (undefined) conversion? Regards, Yann.
