On 15.05.14 13:28 , Eric Covener wrote: > I think there's some disconnect about the role of APR.
No, I think I do understand the concept of the runtime quite well. I'm just saying that if there's support for sha1, then there should be support for (better/safer) more recent algorithms as well. Especially since the most used ones these days are sha256, sha512 and bcrypt. But as I mentioned before, I wasn't aware that bcrypt had already been implemented in APR and also being used by httpd. > But setting that aside, what's missing is someone doing the actual > work, not some principle keeping it out. Well, I can do that. However, there are a few conceptional details I'd like to discuss first. Cheers, Helmut -- regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek lookup http://sks.pkqs.net for KeyID 0xC11F128D /* Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness await thee at its end. */
