On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:11 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Any objections to picking this up for APR 1.next/2.0? > > It seems that httpd isn't the only one who wants to be strict about > case-insensitive token string recognition, and non-POSIX char case > gets weird quickly. +1 to this. Ideally we should add it to APR, and then provide a convenience function in httpd that has the same implementation when the function in APR is missing, and use the APR function when present. Regards, Graham —
