On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:00 PM, <jor...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: jorton > Date: Thu Mar 3 12:00:20 2016 > New Revision: 1733451 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1733451&view=rev > Log: > * include/apr_network_io.h (APR_SO_FREEBIND): Add option. > > * network_io/unix/sockopt.c (apr_socket_opt_set): Implement > APR_SO_FREEBIND on Linux with IP_FREEBIND > [] > > Modified: apr/apr/trunk/network_io/unix/sockopt.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/network_io/unix/sockopt.c?rev=1733451&r1=1733450&r2=1733451&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- apr/apr/trunk/network_io/unix/sockopt.c (original) > +++ apr/apr/trunk/network_io/unix/sockopt.c Thu Mar 3 12:00:20 2016 > @@ -330,6 +330,20 @@ apr_status_t apr_socket_opt_set(apr_sock > return APR_ENOTIMPL; > #endif > break; > + case APR_SO_FREEBIND: > +#if defined(IP_FREEBIND) > + if (setsockopt(sock->socketdes, SOL_IP, IP_FREEBIND, > + (void *)&one, sizeof(int)) == -1) { > + return errno; > + } > + apr_set_option(sock, APR_SO_FREEBIND, on); > +#elif defined(IP_BINDANY) > + /* TODO: insert FreeBSD support here, note family specific > + * options, IP_BINDANY vs IPV6_BINDANY */
Don't we want to return APR_ENOTIMPL here until the FreeBSD implementation? > +#else > + return APR_ENOTIMPL; > +#endif > + break; > default: > return APR_EINVAL; > } Regards, Yann.
