Hi, Here is their response for the record.
Regards, Graham — > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Jari Urpalainen <jari.urpalai...@nokia.com> > Subject: Re: Fwd: DAV Option Patch > Date: 31 May 2016 at 7:43:51 AM SAST > To: Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> > > Hi Graham! > > On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 01:30 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: >> Hi Jari, >> >> A while ago there was an effort to get the outstanding patches from >> mod_caldav applied to Apache httpd, and we got most of them in. >> > > ok, good. > >> I have noticed two patches were missed from mod_dav_acl, which were >> the following for apr and apr-util. Are you able to confirm whether >> the permission you obtained below to submit httpd-2.2.8-ju.patch to >> the ASF under the Apache Licence extended to these two patches as >> well? >> >> If so, I’d like to get them into APR and APR-util. >> >> Regards, >> Graham > > Right, feel free to use them under ASF > > br jari > > >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> From: Jari Urpalainen <jari.urpalai...@nokia.com> >>> Subject: Re: DAV Option Patch >>> Date: 16 September 2009 at 12:03:49 PM SAST >>> To: ext Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> >>> Cc: ext Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>, "d...@httpd.apache.org" < >>> d...@httpd.apache.org> >>> Reply-To: d...@httpd.apache.org >>> >>> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:39 +0200, ext Joe Orton wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:09:23AM +0300, Jari Urpalainen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'll assume that you don't need here the content which is >>>>> included >>>>> within mod_dav_acl package at sf.net ? Otherwise you are >>>>> certainly free >>>>> to use it anyways you like. Patch contains mostly some "hooks" >>>>> to >>>>> mod_dav, but since i'm not that familiar with apr & apache >>>>> code, you can >>>>> certainly improve things. For dav_acl, caldav and carddav >>>>> modules (the >>>>> latter of which i just recently submitted), only similar kind >>>>> of things >>>>> are needed, so you can change the api freely as long as the >>>>> functionality remains. I do have some cycles to update my >>>>> modules >>>>> accordingly. What comes to having included these with httpd, >>>>> I'm in the >>>>> process of asking permission from my company the change the >>>>> license to >>>>> APL >>>> If you can submit the patches to the ASF under the Apache >>>> Software >>>> License, it is sufficient for you to send them to this mailing >>>> list - >>>> that counts as a "contribution to the ASF". >>>> >>>> If you can do that, we can then include the patches in the tree, >>>> but if >>>> your employer owns the copyright to the patches, then be sure you >>>> are >>>> authorized to submit the code under that license first. >>>> >>>> Regards, Joe >>> Ok, here's the patch (which I'm authorized to submit). And yes you >>> can >>> apply the Apache License, Version 2.0 or what is the official name. >>> >>> thanks Jari >>> >>>
