On Sun, 7 May 2017 03:01:55 +0000 Dennis Clarke <dcla...@blastwave.org> wrote:
> On 05/07/2017 12:54 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > So my blocking concern is that APR has never shipped an unready, > > disabled by default feature. I don't mind not ready for prime time > > but we traditionally called such things alpha or beta releases. I > > am not worried about a specific platform, but about the wide range > > of unreviewed architectures. > > I do mind shipping not ready for production prime time. Even a feature labelled as "unready, do not use unless you're prepared to hack it"? > Where is this 1.6.0 tarball such that I may give it a careful build on > my Solaris servers ? > > I don't see it at http://archive.apache.org/dist/apr/ http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ Note: I just re-rolled those, cleaned up as per comments in this thread. The contents (code and build) are unchanged. apr-1.6.0 has known problems and won't be released: we're looking to a 1.6.1. apr-util-1.6.0 is, as far as we know, good to release, but waiting on an updated apr-1.6 candidate. > I have very stable apache builds running in production and am certain > we can wring out what ever issue that may be in there with a pass > through the Oracle dev tools and strict c99 compiler. At the very > least I generally have debug builds wherein I can single step through > the resultant binaries if an issue does appear. Excellent, thanks! -- Nick Kew
