On Mon, 22 May 2017 09:56:54 -0500 William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On May 19, 2017 2:21 PM, "William A Rowe Jr" <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: > > [ ] Release current svn _timedlock API implementation in 1.6 > > This seems to be the only questionable item remaining, and > this vote (and an enhancement may be vetoed, AIUI) is very > distinct from the poll on experimental features. > > Please vote, thanks. > > > I was hoping for more responses In case you're not counting my response on the other thread, I'm for backing out timedlock. We might treat experimental features on a case-by-case basis, but we shouldn't release something fully known to break. -- Nick Kew
