On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:33 AM Branko ─îibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Even if that tool did work this way 16 years ago, this was the wrong way
> to solve the "problem". It's not APR's job to support such tools (except
> for pool debugging modes); it's the downstream application's.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:52 AM Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> +1 definitely, it's a bit bizarre that's done by default TBH.

OK, so it's a candidate to 1.6 possibly? :p

Frankly, I don't see how it could break someone, SIGUSR2 has never
been received by any apr_signal_thread() handler so is in the list of
ignored signals so far, and still will for existing users who don't

Reply via email to