On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:37 PM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:56 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:50 AM Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Code that will compile on 1.7.1 release > > > > still won't compile on 1.7.0, unless I misunderstand something. > > > > > > Is it a requirement in this direction? > > > https://apr.apache.org/versioning.html says "later versions" > > > > That's why I raise the question, I don't have the authoritative answer. > > > > Our SVN participants who adopted and recommended strongly that > > APR follow the semantic versioning [1] approach so they could -also- > > adopt it probably feel more strongly about this. > > It was proposed in another thread to add the APU macros to 1.7.x to > ease later migration to 2.x, I don't think that adding these apr_pool_ > macros can have more compat issues..
My bad, re-reading the thread the proposal was a compat apu_ -> apr_ layer in APR *util* 1.7.x, yet since apr-util 1.7.0 is released already it would be the same kind of compat issue. > > > Cheers; > Yann.
