On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 17:57, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:57 PM <i...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Author: ivan > > Date: Mon Jun 20 21:57:13 2022 > > New Revision: 1902120 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1902120&view=rev > > > [] > > --- apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/test/testfile.c (original) > > +++ apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/test/testfile.c Mon Jun 20 21:57:13 2022 > [] > > @@ -1298,8 +1366,7 @@ abts_suite *testfile(abts_suite *suite) > > abts_run_test(suite, test_fail_read_flush, NULL); > > abts_run_test(suite, test_buffer_set_get, NULL); > > abts_run_test(suite, test_xthread, NULL); > > - abts_run_test(suite, test_datasync_on_file, NULL); > > - abts_run_test(suite, test_datasync_on_stream, NULL); > > Were these two removed intentionally? This causes the below warnings > at least currently: > > testfile.c:1243:13: error: ‘test_datasync_on_stream’ defined but not > used [-Werror=unused-function] > testfile.c:1222:13: error: ‘test_datasync_on_file’ defined but not > used [-Werror=unused-function] > > Hi Yann, No, this change is unintentional. Just incorrect conflict resolution. Should be fixed in r1902145. -- Ivan Zhakov
