On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 6:21 PM Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 19:16, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 18:33, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Ivan, >> >> >> >> I'm responding randomly to one of your ci commits, first to say >> >> thanks, really nice and valuable work! >> >> >> >> I have a question too :) Sorry if it's premature, but I'm also >> >> wondering why we don't see the outputs of the jobs in the github UI, >> >> for instance in [1] for both succeeding and failing jobs the details >> >> of the steps shows "Error:" only without more output (i.e. something >> >> that could help us fix errors). >> >> Do you know if there is a way to show the stdout/stderr of the >> >> commands/scripts instead? >> >> >> > I see error output in testlog: >> >> Ah yes, I actually expected the outputs to be viewable by developing >> the failing step (with the arrow), but the logs are actually available >> via "View raw logs" in the configuration like icon.. >> > I see outputs when click on the failing step. See screenshot in attachement.
Argh, sorry for the noise and your time, the blame is on a javascript filter on my firefox :/ Well, I'm hesitating for my second remark now, but I'm going for it anyway :p It seems that setting both branches like you did in this commit (r1902143): - branches: [ "trunk" ] + branches: [ "trunk", "1.8.x" ] is causing two runs to be launched by gh actions whenever either apr-trunk or apr-1.8.x is modified. Don't we want "trunk" only in "trunk/.github/workflows/linux.yml" and "1.8.x" only in "1.8.x/.github/workflows/linux.yml" instead? I'm double checking but https://github.com/apache/apr/actions really seem to show this behaviour, and somehow one of the build is failing.. Regards; Yann.
