On 22 Apr 2024, at 14:05, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Now the caller needs to allocate memory even if it is not interested in the >>> error or if there is no error at all. >>> Wouldn't it be better to add an apu_err_t **err instead (which can be NULL) >>> and in case of an error allocate an >>> apu_err_t from pool and fill it and return it in **err (provided it was not >>> NULL). >> >> I originally used this pattern and found it overkill - what I do now is >> allocate a app_err_t on the stack and immediately abandon it. > > Did you commit this?
Updated in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1917271&view=rev Regards, Graham --
