Agreed. Ive moved MRM-797 back to 1.1. The rest have been moved back. James
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 21:51 +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > MRM-796 is annoying and confusing for our users. > I think it is a regression, I didn't notice it in 1.0 > Perhaps we could try to fix it for 1.1 and not 1.1.x > > MRM-752, I'll try to propose a patch. It's too stupid and a user (like me) > can loose a some minutes/hours to find the cause. > > MRM-797:I the "delete released snapshots" feature doens't work, perhaps we > could hide it and remove it from the doc ? > > > > Arnaud > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:33 AM, James William Dumay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Brett, > > These issues are now the only ones marked against 1.1. > > > > The remainder of the bugs have been moved to 1.1.x and > > wish/improvements/etc have been bumped to 1.2. > > > > Quick summary: > > * 25 issues need to be closed before the 1.1 release > > * 1.1.x has 59 bugs > > * 1.2 has 63 issues which need to be sorted out when we draw up the next > > roadmap. > > > > Cheers, > > James > > > > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 13:47 +1000, Brett Porter wrote: > > > Cool. I took a run through "unscheduled" and drop them into buckets so > > > it's clean again. > > > > > > So we have 66 issues in 1.1. I believe the following 25 are keepers > > > (some due to patch/review being all that's needed, some because they > > > are important), and the rest can be pushed to 1.1.x or 1.2: > > > 788 > > > 753 > > > 789 > > > 767 > > > 786 > > > 769 > > > 793 > > > 597 / 794 - see if Jetty bundle resolves it > > > 751 > > > 694 > > > 653 > > > 790 > > > 602 > > > 759 > > > 784 > > > 658 > > > 792 > > > 760 > > > 781 > > > 605 > > > 604 > > > 785 > > > 629 > > > 754 > > > > > > I think we can still do a preview release real soon and leave these > > > for the final, while pushing the rest out. Thoughts? > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > On 08/05/2008, at 1:11 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: > > > > > > > Sounds good :-) > > > > > > > > I'm just wrapping up the rss feed issue and will take a look at > > > > MRM-797 next > > > > then I'm good to go with 1.1. > > > > Anybody else still working on issues they wish to include for the 1.1 > > > > release? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Deng > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I just renamed 1.0.x to 1.1.x since I don't think we'll be doing > > > >> any more > > > >> patch releases on 1.0 (correct me if I'm wrong :) > > > >> > > > >> I also created 1.2. > > > >> > > > >> Between the two, we should be able to push out anything in 1.1 that > > > >> might > > > >> not make it to 1.1.x (bugs) and 1.2 (features). > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> Brett > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Brett Porter > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Brett Porter > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > > > >
