Looking good James :) I especially like the new version(s) link.. Thanks for all the work you're putting on this! :)
-Deng On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM, James William Dumay <[email protected]>wrote: > Hey guys, > I thought the versions could do with a come back: > > > http://skitch.com/jdumay/6cqs/archiva-search-w-no-duplicates-and-full-version-list > > What do you think? :) > > James > > > > On 13/12/2008, at 4:46 PM, James William Dumay wrote: > > Hey guys, >> I've done some more work this weekend on the search results. >> >> >> http://skitch.com/jdumay/6cc2/archiva-search-results-w-no-duplicates-repository-id-or-versions-displayed >> >> So far: >> * There are no duplicate entries. >> * I've removed the link to the repository the result was from (otherwise >> we might have two copies of "commons-lang" appearing in the results but from >> different repositories. IMO, this information can be found on the artifact >> info page). >> * Removed the versions available. >> * Clicking on the artifact link now takes you to browse the versions. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> James >> >> >> On 05/12/2008, at 5:39 PM, Brett Porter wrote: >> >> I visited James today and we came up with this list of things to fix a >>> bit more urgently (I'll be putting them in JIRA later). >>> >>> Already changed: >>> * remove dependencies/filecontent from the quick search - must not search >>> for dependencies on commons-lang >>> * change the default search to AND instead of OR >>> >>> Still to look at: >>> - [ ] improve the search results page >>> - [ ] remove metadata files >>> - [ ] merge versions in search results >>> - [ ] for snapshots, just show SNAPSHOT, not timestamps >>> - [ ] show hits in the results (this may not be possible or needed >>> with better results, however) >>> >>> - [ ] existing JIRA complaints >>> - [ ] MRM-732 (tokenizing) >>> - [ ] MRM-495 (weighting) >>> - [ ] MRM-609 (windows bug - may be fixed) >>> - [ ] MRM-933 (hit count, pagination completely busted) >>> >>> - [ ] advanced search >>> - [ ] improve appearance and flexibility, maybe change to "add term" >>> buttons on the default search >>> - [ ] class/package search is still flaky >>> - [ ] might be the analyzer rules, etc. for splitting on '.' >>> >>> - [ ] browse improvements >>> - [ ] artifact version list should show basic shared project information >>> rather than having to drill into one version >>> - [ ] snapshot should go to a page that shows a list of versions >>> (go to latest, but list previous snapshots) >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Brett >>> >>> On 14/11/2008, at 11:40 AM, James William Dumay wrote: >>> >>> Hey guys, >>>> As mentioned on IRC we all agreed that our search feature is a little >>>> suboptimal. >>>> >>>> I would like to propose the following improvements: >>>> * Search should be more like mvnrepository.com (showing codebase growth >>>> etc). >>>> * We should figure out a way of using up stream repository indexes to >>>> improve search results. >>>> * Advanced search needs a good rethink - we should probably use a filter >>>> approach so that you could do bytecode: search results that include free >>>> text search. >>>> * UI improvements so that the user experience feels more intuitive. >>>> >>>> Discuss! >>>> >>>> James >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Brett Porter >>> [email protected] >>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >>> >>> >> > -- Maria Odea Ching Software Engineer | Exist Global | 687-4091 | Skype: maria.odea.ching | www.exist.com | Innovation Delivered
