Yes On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> yep, I guessed it's part of it :) > > I think all of ArchivaXworkUser can be removed if that property is not > being used any more? > > - Brett > > > On 10/03/2009, at 12:12 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > Not exactly, but can be a part of it. >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Author: brett >>> Revision: 751668 >>> Modified property: svn:log >>> >>> Modified: svn:log at Mon Mar 9 13:09:05 2009 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> --- svn:log (original) >>> +++ svn:log Mon Mar 9 13:09:05 2009 >>> @@ -1 +1 @@ >>> -Remove old/unused property >>> +[MRM-938] Remove old/unused property >>> >>> >>> > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > >
