Actually, to provide more detail... There was no functional change here, just a move to reduce the complexity of the transitive closure. I do think in other instances where functionality is enhanced / modified to remove the database, it is important to create separate issues (the next steps are to flesh out the metadata repository, which is probably a candidate for this).
Hope that makes sense! - Brett On 20/11/2009, at 10:05 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > Thanks for the reminder - I'll put the issue tag in all the commit messages. > > This all falls under the branch issue (MRM-1025). This particular change > could actually be ported back to the mainline as it stands alone - but I > don't want to disturb the 1.2.3 work. To some extent, I'm still playing > around with what will work before proposing anything more formal :) > > Cheers, > Brett > > On 20/11/2009, at 4:24 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >> Seems like a big change, is there a JIRA issue with details? -Wendy >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Author: brett >>> Date: Thu Nov 19 17:16:20 2009 >>> New Revision: 882207 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=882207&view=rev >>> Log: >>> split the scheduler into modules to isolate database and indexer dependent >>> code >> ... >
