On 22/12/2009, at 2:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> In the branch, I've added two versions for artifacts: the project version 
>> and the artifact version. So you might have:
>> 
>> project version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT; artifact versions: 1.0-20091123.112233-1, 
>> 1.0-20091123.223344-2
> 
> I had trouble visualizing what you were describing so I couldn't
> comment, but I'm testing the branch at r892806 and I like the display
> of the timestamped snapshot versions out to the right.  I deployed 30
> or so to see what the page would look like,and it continues down the
> page.  It might be cleaner to make the pom snippet a smaller box so it
> doesn't overlap.

Good point, I only got to testing 5 or so. How bad does it look? The rest of 
the page needs some refinement and I'd rather just fiddle the CSS once :)

> 
>> project version: 7.0.1, artifact version: 7.0.1.v20091125
>> 
>> ... that is, it's not specific to snapshots - but it's the main use case 
>> considering here.
> 
> I don't understand how this would work with non-snapshots though.  As
> far as I know, Maven would consider 7.0.1 and 7.0.1.v20091125 to be
> two separate unrelated releases.

Yeah, it'd never be applicable to Maven unless we had some other way to map 
them. I just wanted to generalise the concept.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
[email protected]
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/




Reply via email to