On 09/01/2010, at 8:04 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Browsing and reporting were most affected. Detection of deletions on the >> filesystem are known not to work (next on my list) - other than that it >> should be fine except that the location of the metadata is not final. >> >> Any testing will be helpful, though I'm also particularly interested in >> comments on the architectural changes to see if others are happy going in >> that direction. I think I need to write it up in a more condensed form :) > > I'm not going to be much help with the architecture, but if you > summarize the changes I can work on the docs.
Getting there :) > I'm not sure whether > all references to the database need to get removed because you've > mentioned making it optional. How does that work? Well, that was the original intent, to push database-oriented stuff like reports into pluggable modules only enabled if you choose and have a database configured. However, it seemed feasible to achieve it with the current functionality, so the database isn't required for anything other than users at this point. - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
