Hi Brett, I'm getting test failures in MRM-1025 branch in archiva-modules/plugins/maven2-repository module. From the surefire-reports of Maven2RepositoryMetadataResolverTest, it looks like an ordering problem in the results being compared in one of the assertions..
-Deng On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Deng Ching <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 17/02/2010, at 3:28 AM, Deng Ching wrote: >> >> > >> > In the Configuration section in >> > http://archiva.apache.org/ref/1.4-SNAPSHOT/metadata-content-model.html, it >> > was mentioned that the config should be shadowed to a file in the file >> > system. Is this a one-to-one relationship (e.g. one repository == one >> config >> > file)? >> >> Not necessarily. I expect this would continue to use the same file as now, >> but we can probably simplify the handling quite a bit. >> >> > Ah, ok :) I thought it's going to be a different file from the archiva > config. > > >> >> >> >> * Deletion detection in scanning is still missing, though it would now >> be >> >> quite easy to add back, I didn't get around to it. >> >> >> > >> > In trunk now and in the previous releases, new artifacts are detected >> based >> > on its modified date and the last repo scan.. I assume it's still the >> same? >> >> Yes, no change to the scanning at present, the last repo scans are >> recorded in the content repository. However, the deletion detection was in >> the "database scanning" that is no longer present. While everything else in >> there was migrated to a different solution, this needs to be added back to >> go through the content repository and find stale nodes. The reason I didn't >> do it yet was that I was considering whether to introduce this as a properly >> scheduled, separate, service, or to just take the easier option for now and >> tack it on to the end of the repository scan. >> > > Makes sense.. > > Thanks, > Deng > > >> >> >> >> * While it should be very straightforward, we need to test some >> scenarios >> >> of upgrading from Archiva 1.3. >> >> >> > >> > ..and also upgrading from the lower versions :) >> >> Good point! >> >> > I haven't finished reviewing everything and I'm pretty tired (brain >> isn't >> > working properly now) so I'll just continue looking over this tomorrow >> :) >> >> Thanks! >> >> - Brett >> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [email protected] >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >
