On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Deng, > > On 02/05/2010, at 4:13 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > - // explicitly update only if metadata-updater consumer is > not enabled! > > - if ( > !config.getRepositoryScanning().getKnownContentConsumers().contains( > "metadata-updater" ) ) > > + // explicitly update only if versionMetadata-updater > consumer is not enabled! > > + if ( > !config.getRepositoryScanning().getKnownContentConsumers().contains( > "versionMetadata-updater" ) ) > > Looks like your search/replace went rogue :) > Oops, I didn't notice that :) Thanks for the catch! > > > + String projectPath = targetPath.substring( 0, > targetPath.lastIndexOf( File.separatorChar ) ); > > + File projectMetadataFile = getMetadata( projectPath ); > > I know that code was already there, but I think you could improve it's > reliability with: > File projectDir = new File( targetPath ).getParentFile(); > File projectMetadataFile = new File( projectDir, MAVEN_METADATA ); > > The "getMetadata" method looks small enough to be inlined. > Ok, I'll update this one too. Thanks, Deng
