On 12/09/2011, at 5:18 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > > 2011/9/12 Brett Porter <[email protected]>: >> Wonderful to hear. You're right, it hasn't escaped into the wild. We could >> use more hands. >> >> The two things that are blocking a 1.4 release that contains the staging >> functionality are: >> - deciding on a default production metadata storage (we have a file-backed >> implementation and a JCR-backed implementation) - MRM-1327 > > Something I have on my my TODO is to have a benchmark module to test > both application in a huge load env.
I have some figures based on initial scan times. They probably aren't indicative of normal running situations though, so a good thing to do. > Note we are currently dependant on a jackrabbit SNAPSHOT (but the > release looks to be soon : > http://markmail.org/message/soxy2dddc4rqculj ) > >> - testing and fixing up any bugs that have arrived due to refactoring since >> the last release (several of these are in JIRA for 1.4-M1, though we could >> probably stand to trim that list further) > Agree :-). I will have a look on selenium tests some failed for long time. Hmm, they had been working last time I checked. Are these things broken recently, or have there always been problems? I know there are some spots it doesn't cover particularly well as I've seen a few bugs slip through them. >> >> With regard to the staging functionality in particular, I've started some >> work to improve it, but I need to commit it once I can get past all the >> merge conflicts with Olivier's recent work :) That was mostly to apply the >> improvements after the initial GSoC implementation, particularly to avoid >> them being "full" repositories that has caused us a few problems with search >> & metadata. >> >> Cheers, >> Brett >> >> On 12/09/2011, at 4:25 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >>> Olivier, >>> >>> I'm starting from an informal notion that it's in a snapshot, not yet >>> released. For all I know, the staging feature is entirely fine, and >>> it's other things that need doing that standing in the way of a >>> release. In short, I'm not opinionated, just trying to be helpful. >>> >>> I will also try setting up a copy any playing with it. >>> >>> --benson >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> AFAIK this is something which already exists. >>>> I wanted to improve it too. >>>> What was your idea on how to improve this ? >>>> BTW feel free to create a jira entry. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -- >>>> Olivier Lamy >>>> Talend : http://talend.com >>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>>> >>>> 2011/9/11 Benson Margulies <[email protected]>: >>>>> Folks, >>>>> >>>>> Can you use a pair of hands getting to the point where there is a >>>>> release of archiva with a staging feature? I have selfish, day-job >>>>> motivation here, and if there are JIRA that I could attack and patch I >>>>> am game. >>>>> >>>>> --benson >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [email protected] >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend : http://talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
