They still have different artifact IDs, so they can both be released - it was just the name when it starts, and the directory it unpacks to.
No problem to revert if that's a hassle, though. On 22/03/2012, at 6:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > It was intentional to have different names in order to release both > classic webapp and new ui. > At least at the beginning. > Will you complain if I revert that ? :-) > > > 2012/3/22 <[email protected]>: >> Author: brett >> Date: Thu Mar 22 04:50:57 2012 >> New Revision: 1303656 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1303656&view=rev >> Log: >> JS app doesn't need a different directory >> >> Modified: >> archiva/trunk/archiva-jetty-js/pom.xml >> >> Modified: archiva/trunk/archiva-jetty-js/pom.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/archiva/trunk/archiva-jetty-js/pom.xml?rev=1303656&r1=1303655&r2=1303656&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- archiva/trunk/archiva-jetty-js/pom.xml (original) >> +++ archiva/trunk/archiva-jetty-js/pom.xml Thu Mar 22 04:50:57 2012 >> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ >> <artifactId>archiva-jetty-js</artifactId> >> <packaging>pom</packaging> >> <!-- This is filtered into the scripts, so should be set to Apache Archiva >> --> >> - <name>Apache Archiva JS</name> >> + <name>Apache Archiva</name> >> <dependencies> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.eclipse.jetty</groupId> >> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ >> </executions> >> <configuration> >> <descriptor>src/main/assembly/bin.xml</descriptor> >> - <finalName>apache-archiva-js-${project.version}</finalName> >> + <finalName>apache-archiva-${project.version}</finalName> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> >> <plugin> >> >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter http://twitter.com/brettporter
