I understand the company copyright issue. But if I read that http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#apply There is a Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] ??
2012/7/6 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>: > Ouch yes sorry I didn't check that !! > My bad. > I will. > > 2012/7/6 Brett Porter <[email protected]>: >> >> On 06/07/2012, at 6:43 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> +/* >>> + * Copyright 2012 Zenika >>> + * >>> + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); >>> + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. >>> + * You may obtain a copy of the License at >>> + * >>> + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>> + * >>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software >>> + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, >>> + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. >>> + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and >>> + * limitations under the License. >>> + */ >> >> Can we request the submitter replace these license headers? >> >> - Brett >> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [email protected] >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter >> http://twitter.com/brettporter >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
