Sorry, Olivier, is that "a delete the tag and respin" answer or not?
-Chris On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 January 2014 10:52, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 14 Jan 2014, at 9:34 am, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 13 January 2014 12:02, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Would it make sense to go through some RC cycles? We should plan some > specific promotion of the 2.0.0 release once it is GA. > >> > >> I believe we already did 1.4-M1 to M4 (this sounds already RC for me > :-) ) > > > > I was thinking more like the typical Maven releases - in other words, if > we put up 2.0.0 for vote and it fails, what happens next? Re-spin 2.0.0, > move to 2.0.1, or do we start out with some 2.0.0-RCx releases until it's > good? Or do we do more snapshot testing until we already have a passable > number of +1's and then just vote on 2.0.0 then? > > > RCx some good for a major release. I can start working with a RC branch. > > But I'd like we use the Tomcat model (move from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1 etc.. > and keep the tag in svn) but for IMHO make more sense to have 2.0.0 > first before a 2.0.1 :-) > > > > > > >> > >>> > >>> Definitely like to see releases moving forward. I know I've been slack > on testing recently... unfortunately this week is particularly bad as I'm > fully booked up already :) > >> > >> Releasing will be more than a week. So no worries you will have time to > test :P > > > > Thanks :) > > > > - Brett > > > > -- > > Brett Porter @brettporter > > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >
