Hi Martin, Thanks for the release. Web pages seems ok. For the checksums we may only go for sha512, it's not mandatory to have both in the policy (I see that on Maven and NetBeans). I was just saying that to simplify release steps.
Regards Eric -----Message d'origine----- De : Martin <[email protected]> Envoyé : mardi 30 avril 2019 17:52 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: [VOTE] Archiva release 2.2.4 Hi Eric, I created the checksums for all artifacts downloaded from the repository server. On the web site there are links for the sha256 and sha512 checksums and not for the asc files. I think we should provide at least two checksum types on the web site. See http://archiva.apache.org/download.cgi Just tell me, if you have any suggestions. Regards Martin Am Freitag, 26. April 2019, 14:19:05 CEST schrieb Eric Barboni: > +1 > > Sha512ok, signature ok. Tested in production OK. > Thanks a lot for the release > > Best Regards > Eric > PS: Do we need all the sha256,sha384 ? > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Martin <[email protected]> > Envoyé : jeudi 25 avril 2019 21:24 > À : [email protected] > Objet : [VOTE] Archiva release 2.2.4 > > Hi, > > I think I managed to get Version 2.2.4 into release state. > > Its a minor bugfix release. > > Parent pom and Redback version have not changed. > > We fixed these issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316920&ve > rsion=12341441 > > The staging repository is available here: > https://archiva-repository.apache.org/archiva/repository/archiva-releases-st > age/ > > Dist artifacts here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/archiva/2.2.4 > > The documentation is available at: > http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.2.4/ > > Vote open for at least 72H > [+1] > [0] > [-1] > > > Greetings > > Martin Stockhammer > > > >
