Hello Neil!
I think every language with reverse engineering functions can decide for
themselves if they use antlr v2, antlr v3, or something completely
different. There is no reason to coordinate this on a development level.
This is because I consider the language things (code generation and
reverse engineering) to be separate modules that are plugged into
argouml independently.
When building releases we need to coordinate this but that is another
problem.
Currently antlr is part of the core argouml because the java reverse
engineering is part of the argouml but I am hoping that this will
eventually change. I have created the project for it but I don't think
it is very high on anyone's priority list.
/Linus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 9 juni 2006 21:02
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [argouml-dev] Antlr V3
>
> Linus Tolke wrote:
> > reverse engineering features in argouml use ANTLR. If you are
> > going to do reverse engineering for PHP, I suggest you start by
> > searching for an ANTLR grammar for PHP. If there exists one, then
you
> > are almost there ;-).
> >
> I've dived in and Googled around but can't find a PHP grammar. There
is
> a rumour of a grammar being developed for V3.
>
> From my naive look at Antlr I have deduced that V3 (with ANTLRWorks)
> looks more worth learning than V2. So, this begs the questions:
>
> Will any work I do on a PHP grammar in V3 be any use for ArgoUML?
>
> Are there plans to port the existing grammars used by ArgoUML to ANTLR
> V3 ?
>
> Best regards
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
