Hi Linus, et al.,
 
I see the same problem.
Apparently, this is the second problem with the JavadocMethod check. See also:
 
Luckily, I found a solution today (for this 2nd problem):
 
Index: C:/Documents and Settings/Michiel/My Documents/Java_Development/ArgoUML_SVN_Workspace/argouml-core-tools/checkstyle/checkstyle_argouml.xml
===================================================================
--- C:/Documents and Settings/Michiel/My Documents/Java_Development/ArgoUML_SVN_Workspace/argouml-core-tools/checkstyle/checkstyle_argouml.xml (revision 11286)
+++ C:/Documents and Settings/Michiel/My Documents/Java_Development/ArgoUML_SVN_Workspace/argouml-core-tools/checkstyle/checkstyle_argouml.xml (working copy)
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@
     <module name="JavadocMethod">
       <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
       <property name="allowUndeclaredRTE" value="true"/>
+      <property name="logLoadErrors" value="true"/>
+      <property name="suppressLoadErrors" value="true"/>
     </module>
     <module name="JavadocVariable">
       <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
I do not know if both lines are required, but it solves the problem like this.
If this works for you too, please commit!
 
PS: But I fear I will have to comment out the complete JavadocMethod check again, since the 1st problem is still not solved yet.
 
Regards,
Michiel
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] The new version of checkclipse

I am referring to the

Got an exception - java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to get class information for @throws tag *whatever*.

errors.

 

            /Linus

 


From: Linus Tolke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 17 oktober 2006 16:03
To: [email protected]
Subject: [argouml-dev] The new version of checkclipse

 

Hello all!

 

I attempted to enable checklipse 2.1.0 (the latest available version) in my Eclipse 3.2 installation that previously didn’t have a checklipse.

 

I noticed that it doesn’t work i.e. it gives a lot of false errors. This seems to be a known problem that has been bounced back and forth a little between the checkstyle and the checklipse project but appearantly not resolved.

 

What can we do about it? Shall we just wait and accept that we have these false errors? Anything else?

 

            /Linus

 

************************************************

Linus Tolke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ArgoUML

************************************************

 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/478 - Release Date: 17/10/2006
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release Date: 18/10/2006

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to