> I don't think Subversion has the concept of tags so I am very > confused by this.
That's true at an abstract level since the SVN folks like to claim "everything is just a file" but both tools and people which use SVN have a very strong concept of what tags are. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.tags.html > What is the Subclipse SVN Resource History Tags column > supposed to contain and how is it generated? It looks like it uses information in the subclipse:tags property. http://subclipse.tigris.org/branch_tag.html I'm not sure if this got broken when the Tags directory was removed or if something else broke it. I'll see if recommitting the property fixes things. I'm guessing it will. Does the concept of "release," which is a little bit of a "tag" and a little bit of a "branch," have enough extra value to justify the overhead of defining and maintaining it or could we make do with the concepts that everyone already knows? All of the Eclipse Team subsystem functionality (for both CVS & SVN) is based on branches and tags. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
