> Does this mean that the split-model repository is not > included in 0.24? I suppose so.
I haven't seen any checkins related to this, so I think that's a safe assumption. Most of the issues related to this work are assigned to me, but I'm pretty sure that I never committed to completing the work for this release. If someone can point me to where I gave this misimpression, I'll work on clarifying the communications in the future. I presume the date for 0.24.beta2 is meant to be 2007-02-04, not 2007-01-04. I don't understand the ArgoEclipse reference. ArgoEclipse is a separate project on an independent release cycle. Since this is principally a bug fix release, a month should be fine to get things stabilized and out the door (as long as we stay focused). Tom > -----Original Message----- > From: Linus Tolke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 5:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [argouml-dev] Plan for the 0.24 release > > Great! > > For the 10th of February I have now set a suggested plan for > the alpha and beta period. According to the plan the first > alpha will be made on Wednesday. > > Does this mean that the split-model repository is not > included in 0.24? I suppose so. > > Please comment on the suggested plan! > > /Linus > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bob Tarling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: den 5 januari 2007 00:19 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] The release 0.23.5 > > > > > You can now commit in trunk towards the next release. If the next > > release is > > > denoted 0.23.6 or 0.24.alpha1 is still not decided. I > will denote it > as > > > 0.23.6 for the time being. > > > > Is there some reason to delay the date of the 0.24 release? > Surely we > > should be making weekly alphas and then betas to make 10th Feb. > > > > Bob. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
