Dear Tom,
Tom Morris wrote:
<snip />
One aspect of the described approach that I'd like to understand better is
the replacement of the OMG UML 1.4 metamodel with a combined UML/OCL
metamodel. Does this have any impact on the rest of ArgoUML? (Or are you
taking a different approach?)
This shouldn't actually pose a problem. The integration is (pretty much)
unidirectional. We do add some additional super-classes to classes in
the UML metamodel, but they shouldn't cause problems. They are really
only there to allow us to generalise the connection between OCL and UML,
and OCL and MOF, resp. We had a paper on this at the OCL workshop in
2003:
http://www-st.inf.tu-dresden.de/home/html/de/forschung/publikationen/LoecherOcke2003.pdf
which explains the basic concepts.
Best regards,
Steffen
--
Dipl.-Inf. Steffen Zschaler
Research Assistant
Technische Universität Dresden
Department of Computer Science
Phone +49 351 463 38555
Fax +49 351 463 38459
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW http://www.steffen-zschaler.de.vu/
---
Take part in MiSE 2007, http://mse07.sse.cs.tu-bs.de/
the Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering @ ICSE 2007
to be held 19-20 May, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
