As Michiel points out on http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4632 ArgoUML has traditionally used critics to suggest design improvements.
I think there is often a fundamental difference in a poor design and a badly formed model. Especially if we want that model to be used by other tools. At the moment we do have some enforcement in the code. I've been trying to javadoc when I find these with references to the section in the UML spec. I'd like to suggest that we start a section in the cookbook where we document these. This will make it clear what has been agreed for each specific welformedness rule. I'd suggest that for each wellformedness rule that we enforce we state the rule reference in UML1.4.2, the text of that rule and where in the code this is enforced. I'd hope that as these are discovered we can move any enforcement to the model subsystem. Regards Bob. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
