I don't think the Model subsystem should be making policy decisions like whether or not well-formedness rules are enforced. That's really up to the application to decide (and it may vary based on circumstance in addition to varying by application).
Accordingly, I'm about to commit a change to the Model API to make this checking optional (and change the calls in ArgoUML to request this checking). Tom > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Tarling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Wellformedness rules again > > aHi Linus > > I'm not aware of any well-formedness rules in UML1.4.2 that > are for anything other than for model elements. > > As I've mentioned earlier I don't think we should enforce all > well-formedness rules and each is up for discussion. Where we > do currently enforce I think it it is the responsibility of > the model subsystem to do so. That keeps the code centralised > in our existing architecture. > > Regards > > Bob. > > On 13/02/07, Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Bob! > > > > Bob Tarling wrote in a commit comment: > > > Check wellformedness rule 4.5.3.20 [5] in a centralised place. > > > > Does this means that it is the Model subsystem responsibility to > > contain tests for all wellformedness rules? Or just the > wellformedness > > rules that does contain only model elements? > > > > /Linus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
