Hello Bob,
I've been bitten by NullPointerExceptions several times with
auto-boxing. But, I like the feature and tend to prefer
less code, so, I'm not in favor of having usage of auto-boxing
disallowed in ArgoUML.
Luis
Bob Tarling wrote:
The only Java 5 language feature I'm not so keen on is the
autoboxing/unboxing. It seems to me that this can create on overhead
of small objects being created and destroyed frequently when this is
not necessarily the developers intention.
I tend to explicitly convert long to Long etc.
This is a personal preference of mine so I just want to sound out how
others feel about making this a coding guideline in ArgoUML.
Is this something that checkstyle/checklipse can help us control?
Regards
Bob.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
