Hi David, Why would you want to access the notationProviderName attribute? It is a complete implementation of handling the name of a UML element. If you can not use it, replace it.
If you implement another notation language (like we already have UML, Java, C++), then you should implement another set of NotationProviders. And if you have other types of FigEdgeModelElement which require specific UML notation, then override all functions where the notationProviderName is used, and create your own NotationProvider: protected void initNotationProviders(Object own) protected void textEditStarted(FigText ft) protected String getParsingHelp() protected void textEdited(FigText ft) Regards, Michiel ----- Original Message ----- From: David Orejuela To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 11:15 AM Subject: [argouml-dev] Problems with notationProviderName visibility Hello, my name is David Orejuela I just started working with ArgoUML for the University of Seville with Joaquín Peña and Christian López (penyaskito). We are working on MacMas (an ArgoUML module), an investigation project related with intelligent systems. Now, I'm adapting the MacMas module to a new stable version ( 0.24) of ArgoUML. (from the revision 11615 to the 11941) Some errors and warnings have appeared, like the following: In the new version the notationProviderName attribute of the class FigEdgeModelElement has changed from protected to private. How I get now this information? Thanks in advance ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.9/870 - Release Date: 26/06/2007 10:07
