Hi, I concur with the 1st statement being correct.
See issue http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1395 HTH. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2007 20:38 To: 'Bogdan Ciprian Pistol' Cc: 'ArgoUML Developers' Subject: [argouml-dev] RE: Default Multiplicity of association end Hi Bogdan, Don't forget to say whether you're asking about UML 1.4 or UML 2.1.1. In this case I don't think it makes a difference however. > I searched for a default multiplicity of an association end > in the specification and didn't found any. I believe that's true for UML 1.4 and I don't see anything that indicates it's changed for UML 2.x. > AFAIK, if the multiplicity is not defined then no conclusions > can be drawn from the UML model about it Or a default > multiplicity of 0..1 would be appropriate, or a multiplicity of 1..1. I believe your first statement is more accurate. One example where this might be true is an incomplete model where a multiplicity hasn't been specified yet. In this case, the modeller (person) has intentionally left it unspecified, so it would be inappropriate to draw a conclusion (or enforce a default). Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/890 - Release Date: 07/07/2007 15:26 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/891 - Release Date: 08/07/2007 18:32 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
