Sure! You are now an observer Jules!
On the other hand, we use the terms verify and the step in issuezilla to
verify against a released version. (See Cookbook section 9.5
http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/defaulthtml/cookbook/ch09s05.html)
so
formally you'd better do it against the 0.25.5 release once issued.
/Linus
2008/1/15, Grengbondai, Jules C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks Michiel!
>
> Linus, would you give an observer role?
>
> Thanks,
> Jules
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michiel van der Wulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:37 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before
> the
> > Modules?
> >
> > Hi Jules,
> > If you log in, and you have the observer role, then you can change
> issues.
> > Anyhow, I will adapt the issue now with your input.
> > Regards.
> > Michiel
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Grengbondai, Jules C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 8:08 PM
> > Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before
> the
> > Modules?
> >
> >
> > Hi Michiel,
> >
> > I verified issue 4952 and it works fine. Thanks! But I do not think I
> > have
> > the privilege for changing the status (or maybe I do not know how to
> mark
> > it
> > VERIFIED).
> > Please close it if you can or show me how to update the status.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jules
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Christian López Espínola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:31 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI before
> > the
> > > Modules?
> > >
> > > Thanks for fixing it Michiel.
> > > With a near stable release soon, I expected to avoid this kind of
> > > problems, and letting the modules work as them worked before.
> > > Anyway, I feel that this is a defered issue, and we should provide an
> > > API independent of the order of initialization.
> > > I think that we should work on solving this as soon as the stable
> > > release is done, so modules are independent ones from anothers.
> > > Someone asked in a previous thread what are the values of ArgoUML. I
> > > have been monitoring some forums, and many of them mentioned that
> > > ArgoUML has code generation for a lot of languages. Maybe one of the
> > > values are the possibility of writing modules, for code generation or
> > > anything else, so we should make an effort for provide them a clear,
> > > easy and functional API.
> > > I hope that, once the release is done, we should discuss a way of
> > > reaching this goal through a good design (maybe the discussion could
> > > start before).
> > >
> > > On Jan 14, 2008 11:16 PM, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom, Jules, et al.,
> > > >
> > > > I just committed a new version of the Main class.
> > > > Now we have the same initialisation sequence as before the profile
> > stuff
> > > was
> > > > committed.
> > > >
> > > > Tested with ArgoUML standalone, with the "dev" module, and with the
> > > > commandline in batch mode (see
> > > > http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/quick-guide-
> > > 0.24/ch02s04.html).
> > > > This new version needs some testing of the profiles function -
> please
> > > help
> > > > with this!
> > > >
> > > > Jules, does this solve your issue 4952? - If so, please put it on
> > fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Michiel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Grengbondai, Jules C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:36 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI
> before
> > > the
> > > > Modules?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > This problem is related to issue 4952 that I reported.
> > > > http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4952
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jules
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Tom Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:55 PM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Shall we agree to initialise the GUI
> > before
> > > > the
> > > > > Modules?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jan 13, 2008 5:15 AM, Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In the light of issue 4752, can we agree upon the following?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ArgouML shall initialise the Gui BEFORE the Modules are
> > > > initialised.
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess it depends on what we mean by "initialize." I think part
> of
> > > > > the problem is that everyone wants to be initialized first or last
> > and
> > > > > that we do too much initialization too early.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should be doing:
> > > > >
> > > > > - lazy initialization - don't initialize things until needed
> > > > > - run time extension - modules can add extensions whenever they
> want
> > > > >
> > > > > Having said that, in the short term, I think we need to stabilize
> > > > > things and the best way to do that is probably to revert to the
> > > > > initialization order that we used before the profile work was
> > > > > introduced. Is that what your proposal does?
> > > > >
> > > > > Tom
> > > > >
> > > > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1223 - Release Date:
> > > 13/01/2008
> > > > 20:23
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Christian López Espínola
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.2/1224 - Release Date:
> > 14/01/2008
> > 17:39
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
