We shouldn't! Instead of fixing the "new" module loader we should probably
replace it by the Eclipse module loader. If anyone is up for this that is
most welcome. Otherwise I think I will suggest this as a task for this
summer's GSoC 2008.
/Linus
2008/1/14, Tom Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Jan 12, 2008 3:47 AM, Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Treating the ArgoUML as something that can be updated and extended while
> > running is a very appealing thought. [...] One of my ideas
> > when making the "new" module loader was to allow the user to specify
> more
> > modules to download later on.
>
> Sounds exactly like the Eclipse update mechanism that we use for
> updating the ArgoEclipse plugins. Why would we reinvent this
> particular wheel?
>
> Tom
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
