Hello Thomas!
The project is the argouml-java project. The purpose of that is to refactor
the java-code generation, reverse engineering, and round-trip, not an
upgrade to another version of antlr.
On the other hand, you could keep you work in that project and once you are
done we remove from the argouml-project and distribute the argouml-java
project with it. This could defer the decision on what release this is
delivered in.
On the other hand, you could just as well do your work in the argouml
project if you want to address the upgrade of antlr version first without
moving of the java support.
/Linus
2008/4/16, Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I started working on the Antlr 3.0.1 Upgrade, see issue #5019
> http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5019
> (have a look at the new grammar I attached)
>
> Still got no idea when and how to commit the work. issues:
> - decision if it goes into 0.26
> - how to integrate the Antlr jars without disturbing other import modules
>
> Any help is appreciated (Linus once stated that he begun a project for
> it?), and if I got questions, I get back to you.
>
> Regarding the other grammar in Java code generation: I'm still for
> removing it and let everything be generated from the model, which implies
> that import must be as complete as possible (configurable). I don't want to
> work on CG anymore, but am willing to help. Removing that grammar is a
> simple task, by the way.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Neustupny
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:25:46 -0400
> > Von: "Tom Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: RE: [argouml-dev] ANTLR java.g (was JavaRecognizer)
>
> > It's not as simple as just removing one java.g because they do different
> > things. Each one has little snippets of embedded Java specific to the
> > task
> > they do. This could certainly be designed differently/better, but it's
> a
> > non-trivial task. Of the two files, the reverse engineering one is more
> > current. It supports Java 1.5 while the code generation one only
> supports
> > Java 1.2 (I think).
> >
> > If someone wants to work on cleaning this up, it might make more sense
> to
> > base the effort on ANTLR v3 which is feature complete and planned for
> > release in the "Fall" (which started today).
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mathieu Suen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:51 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [argouml-dev] Re : [argouml-dev] JavaRecognizer
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok so we can remove it to avoid dependency between module
> > >
> > > Jan M. Andersen a écrit :
> > > > I think the reason for two java.g files is that the Java code
> > > > generator and the Java code import is located in two different
> > > > modules.
> > > >
> > > > Jan.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mathieu Suen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 22. september 2006 12:59
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: [argouml-dev] Re : [argouml-dev] JavaRecognizer
> > > >
> > > > Yes could be intresting. :) Tell me how to process (In which way do
> > > > you want the fix..)
> > > >
> > > > In fact I do school exersise on it. I have to look inside
> > > you source
> > > > to find out problems, analyse metric and so on. Removing this class
> > > > could be intresting to see dependency with other package..
> > > >
> > > > So do you have any pointer on class that you know there are badly
> > > > written?
> > > >
> > > > Or do you have some that you are "proud" of it? It could be
> > > quite nice
> > > > to show a good method.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > > Math
> > > >
> > > > Linus Tolke a écrit :
> > > >> Hello Mathieu!
> > > >>
> > > >> As you have probably noticed the JavaRecognizer.java is generated
> > > >> from java.g by ANTLR. The change to a Visitor pattern, is
> > > that part
> > > >> of the API changes planned for ANTLR 3.
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't know the reason we have two java.g and generated files. I
> > > >> think it is forgotten about by now and I would like if we could
> > > >> remove one of them. Would you like to dig into this unify them?
> > > >>
> > > >> /Linus
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> From: Mathieu Suen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>> Sent: den 22 september 2006 01:45
> > > >>> To: [email protected]
> > > >>> Subject: [argouml-dev] JavaRecognizer
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I was looking how you were implementing language stuff
> > > and I found
> > > >>> out that you have JavaRecognizer. But it seem to me that
> > > is more a
> > > >>> parser than a reconizer. BTW I don't
> > > >> know
> > > >>> what reconizer mean.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I how see also that you have 2 JavaRecognizer witch is suprising.
> > > >>> Why?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have seen that is a really big class why don't you use a tree to
> > > >> analyse
> > > >>> Java and so you can apply
> > > >>> Visitor pattern. This is fun and you can easily manipulate source.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks for answer comment.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> cheers
> > > >>> Math
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > _____________
> > > Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions
> > > quelque soit le sujet !
> > > Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances,
> > > vos opinions et vos expériences.
> > > http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
> Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
