On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Luis Sergio Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would also agree that moving more things from argouml/tools into the > argouml/src directory tree would be a bad move. One of the reasons behind > the restructuring was to lower the basic checkout time. I wasn't aware that it was a goal of the restructuring, but it's a good idea in general. > cobertura and similar libraries and targets even if kept in > argouml/src/argouml-build/build.xml, should be only possible to execute in > the full SVN checkout or in the context of the nightly build in argouml-gen. I agree that we should keep the basic toolset to compact. Having said that, let's look at the actual relative sizes of things (sizes in KB): 11407 ./fop-0.20.5 8733 ./apache-ant-1.7.0 5773 ./checkstyle-4.3 2922 ./pmd-4.0 1469 ./cobertura-1.9 647 ./jdepend-2.9 467 ./classycle 348 ./junit-3.8.2 FOP is only used to build the documentation, which almost no one does and is in its own project anyway. Ant is a tool that everyone has installed already. Checkstyle is as big as all the remaining tools combined. If we want to put this directory on a diet, there are lots of places to cut. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
