Didn't realise we had that agreed. I'm pretty happy so long as we are consistent.
Bob. 2008/5/1 Michiel van der Wulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Bob, > > > > > We seem to use the term module and plugin interchangeably. Could we > > settle on one. I would suggest plugin as it tends to fit eclipse > > terminology better. > > > > My usual reply to naming discussions is: "Synonyms cost money". My > experience in professional life surely confirms this statement. > > However, there is also a human factor: people love to use new exciting > names for old things. Maybe this gives then the feeling to be creative, and > helps them to motivate. Or it is a community feeling: The ones that know and > use the new name are on the train of progress, the others are left behind. > > Following the lead of Eclipse is surely stepping on the train of progress. > Hmmm... the human factor may prevail. > > But: We had the discussion module vs. plugin before; see > http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/documentation/defaulthtml/cookbook/go01.html > Hence, my vote is to stick to what we have: modules. > What sounds better than plugging in a module? > > Regards, > Michiel > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
