Re: [argouml-dev] C++ module preprocessor

[Luis Sergio Oliveira]

Hi Andreas, sorry, but, I forgot to mention your name in the commit comment... The good news is that the work is in the repository, 1.2.3 and all :-). The bad news is that it has a big problem... Basically the anarres.jar isn't being found or something similar and the whole reveng module isn't working. I'll try to fix this, but, I will have time only on Thursday. Then there is a small problem with some automated tests failing because the preprocessor doesn't close the readers it opens on CppReader.close(). I will have to propose a patch to the author. I think the above is feasible before 0.26. If not I may release a specific module only release 0.26.cpp.1 with the necessary fixes. Regards, Luis Andreas Rückert wrote: (...) Hi Andreas, I would like to have a link to the license and to the version you sent me (sorry if I missed these in this thread or in a different thread). I would like to provide the zipped sources and the license in a text file along with the jar of anarres-cpp.jar. The link of the anarres jar? Downloads are here: http://www.anarres.org/projects/jcpp/ I used the 1.2.2 version. It seems. there's 1.2.3 now. Don't know the differences yet... Apache license: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html Concerning the integration of your work: 1. the CppImporter and the changes to the argouml-cpp/build.xml are done; 2. I have some failing tests (automated) caused by the test directory not being possible to be deleted - this is one reason I would like to have the sources for help in debugging these and to enable it to be done in the future; see above... 3. I'm going to change the install target of argouml-cpp/build.xml to copy the lib/anarres-cpp.jar into the ext directory along with argo_cpp.jar. Ok, that decision was not yet made, when I gave you the changes... --<snip>-- No, your checkout layout isn't supported nor will it be at least ??? The modules dir is already in svn, so it was not my idea to copy the sources there... --<snip>-- That's nice. But, the features aren't missing in David Wigg's grammar. The support for enums, templates, etc are missing in the ModelerImpl and some callbacks from the grammar file into Modeler (being that this is missing the corresponding operations). I should check it, but, I'll let you know of my opinion in a different thread... Ok. Read you then... Ciao, Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]